| |
|
BUY
TO LET MARKET SUMMARY
|
| Period |
|
Mortgages
outstanding at end of period |
|
Mortgages
outstanding at end of period |
|
Mortgages
outstanding at end of period |
|
Gross advance
in period |
|
Gross advance
in period |
|
Gross advance
in period |
|
Mortgages 3+
months in arrears |
|
Maximum LTV |
|
Minimum
rental cover |
|
Aggregate
loan ceiling to individual investor |
| |
|
Number |
|
£m |
|
% of total by
value |
|
Number |
|
£m |
|
% of total by
value |
|
% of all
mortgages |
|
% |
|
% of rental
income |
|
£ |
| 1999: H1 |
|
58,800 |
|
3,600 |
|
0.8 |
|
21,800 |
|
1,500 |
|
2.985 |
|
0.45 |
|
75 |
|
130 |
|
600,000 |
| H2 |
|
73,200 |
|
5,400 |
|
1.1 |
|
22,600 |
|
1,600 |
|
2.5 |
|
0.50 |
|
75 |
|
130 |
|
600,000 |
| 2000: H1 |
|
89,000 |
|
6,600 |
|
1.3 |
|
21,300 |
|
1,700 |
|
3.0 |
|
0.39 |
|
75 |
|
130 |
|
1,000,000 |
| H2 |
|
120,300 |
|
9,100 |
|
1.7 |
|
27,100 |
|
2,200 |
|
3.5 |
|
0.47 |
|
78 |
|
130 |
|
500,000 |
| 2001: H1 |
|
144,700 |
|
11,300 |
|
2.0 |
|
30,700 |
|
2,800 |
|
3.9 |
|
0.55 |
|
80 |
|
130 |
|
500,000 |
| H2 |
|
185,000 |
|
14,700 |
|
2.5 |
|
41,500 |
|
4,100 |
|
4.6 |
|
0.55 |
|
80 |
|
130 |
|
500,000 |
| 2002: H1 |
|
232,900 |
|
19,100 |
|
3.1 |
|
58,700 |
|
5,500 |
|
5.7 |
|
0.43 |
|
80 |
|
130 |
|
750,000 |
| H2 |
|
275,500 |
|
24,200 |
|
3.6 |
|
71,300 |
|
6,700 |
|
5.4 |
|
0.40 |
|
80 |
|
130 |
|
750,000 |
| 2003: H1 |
|
332,500 |
|
31,000 |
|
4.3 |
|
74,600 |
|
7,600 |
|
6.2 |
|
0.39 |
|
80 |
|
130 |
|
1,000,000 |
| H2 |
|
417,500 |
|
39,000 |
|
5.0 |
|
113,000 |
|
11,600 |
|
7.5 |
|
0.33 |
|
80 |
|
130 |
|
1,000,000 |
| 2004: H1 |
|
473,200 |
|
46,800 |
|
5.7 |
|
119,900 |
|
12,000 |
|
8.3 |
|
0.37 |
|
80 |
|
130 |
|
1,000,000 |
| H2 |
|
576,700 |
|
56,900 |
|
6.5 |
|
106,700 |
|
10,700 |
|
7.3 |
|
0.54 |
|
80 |
|
130 |
|
1,000,000 |
| 2005: H1 |
|
630,100 |
|
63,200 |
|
6.9 |
|
93,000 |
|
9,900 |
|
7.8 |
|
0.70 |
|
80 |
|
130 |
|
1,000,000 |
| H2 |
|
699,400 |
|
73,100 |
|
7.6 |
|
130,000 |
|
14,600 |
|
9.0 |
|
0.65 |
|
85 |
|
125 |
|
1,000,000 |
| 2006: H1 |
|
764,900 |
|
83,600 |
|
8.2 |
|
151,900 |
|
17,400 |
|
10.9 |
|
0.64 |
|
85 |
|
125 |
|
1,000,000 |
| H2 |
|
846,900 |
|
94,400 |
|
8.8 |
|
177,200 |
|
20,800 |
|
11.2 |
|
0.58 |
|
85 |
|
125 |
|
1,500,000 |
| 2007: H1 |
|
938,500 |
|
107,800 |
|
9.5 |
|
171,800 |
|
21,200 |
|
11.9 |
|
0.63 |
|
85 |
|
125 |
|
2,500,000 |
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Source:
CML Research
1.
There is a step change in the H1 2005 figures as a big lender
submitted data for the first time. Hence, comparisons between H2
2004 and H1 2005 cannot be made on a like for-like basis.
Lending figures are otherwise grossed up to ensure figures are compatible
across periods.
2.The
CML has estimated lending data where a lender has not reported
figures in a particular period.
3.Underwriting
criteria represents the median average of the individual limits
applied be lenders.
4.
Results may be compared over time but care should be taken with
pre-2000 figures.
|
|
|
|
|